Department of Justice Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

RESEARCH REPORT

The Child-centred Family Justice Strategy: Baseline Information from Family Law Practitioners

December 2005

[ Table of Contents | Next ]



Prepared by:
Joanne J. Paetsch, BA
Lorne D. Bertrand, PhD
Nicholas Bala, LLM
and
Joseph P. Hornick, PhD

Presented to:
Family, Children and Youth Section
Department of Justice Canada

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Justice Canada or the Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family.

Aussi disponible en français

PDF VersionPDF Help

This report may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, without charge or further permission from the Department of Justice Canada, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; that the Department of Justice Canada is identified as the source department; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the original report.

©  Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada,
    represented by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada,
    2005


Table of Contents

List of Tables

Table 2.1
Respondents' Continuing Education or Training on Family Law Issues in the Past Five Years
Table 2.2
Characteristics of Respondents' Family Law Cases in the Past Year
Table 2.3
Proportion of Respondents' Cases in the Past Year Resolved by Various Methods
Table 2.4
Respondents' Reports as to Which Issues in Divorce and Variation Cases are Most Likely to Require a Trial and Judicial Decision to be Resolved
Table 2.5
Respondents' Perceptions of How Well Informed Their Clients are at the Outset of Their Case
Table 2.6
Respondents' Reports of How Often They Inform Clients About or Refer Clients to Various Family Justice Services
Table 2.7
Extent to Which Respondents Agree that Unified Family Courts Accomplish Specific Objectives
Table 2.8
Respondents' Perceptions of Whether Parenting Arrangements Made Through Specific Processes are Consistent with the Best Interests of the Child
Table 2.9
Respondents' Perceptions of How Often Parents Share Decision Making in Specific Areas
Table 2.10
Respondents' Perceptions of What the Circumstances are When Parents do not Comply with their Custody/Access Orders and How Frequently it Occurs
Table 2.11
Proportion of Respondents Recommending Supervised Access or Exchange Under Various Circumstances
Table 2.12
Respondents' Perceptions of How Often Specific Reasons are Given in Cases Where Parental Relocation is an Issue
Table 2.13
Respondents' Perceptions of What the Circumstances are in Cases Where Parental Relocation is an Issue and How Frequently it Occurs
Table 2.14
Respondents' Opinions Regarding Objectives of the Federal Child Support ... Guidelines
Table 2.15
Respondents' Perceptions of What the Circumstances are in Cases Where Spousal Support is an Issue and How Frequently it Occurs
Table 2.16
Respondents' Reports on How the Court Addressed the Issue in Cases Involving Spousal Violence and How Frequently it Occurred
Table 2.17
Respondents' Reports on How the Court Addressed the Issue in Cases Involving Child Abuse and How Frequently it Occurred

List of Figures

Figure 2.1
Percentage of Respondents from Each Province or Territory
Figure 2.2
Respondents' Views on How Much Weight Should be Given to the Preference of Children at Specified Age Ranges

[ Table of Contents | Next ]